Measured figures only
If we did not measure it, it does not go here — however freely competitors quote the same number. If we cannot state the scope and the conditions, it is not a case study.
Everything here is a figure we actually measured. We publish the scope, the conditions and the date alongside it, and we name clients only where they have agreed to it. No projections, no estimates.
97.0% Baggage loading judgment
97.0% on baggage loading judgment — ANA Chubu Airport
Rate at which loading judgment resolved during the sorting-area proof of concept
Aichi Digital Island Project "TECH MEETS" / Aichi Prefecture
Read the case study → ~61% Less time on inbound cargo matching
About 61% less time on inbound cargo matching — Meitetsu World Transport
Within the measured scope of inbound handling: 370 seconds down to 142.72 seconds
Aichi Digital Island Project "TECH MEETS" / Aichi Prefecture
Read the case study →What we publish
There are few of these because we did not lower the bar.
Named clients only, with consent
You will not find "a major manufacturer" here. We publish the client's registered name, and only where they have agreed to it.
We also track what did not work
Including projects we cannot publish, we keep a record of where accuracy fell short and where a system failed to hold in daily use. We will tell you about those too.
If this looks like your problem, start with thirty minutes.
We will tell you plainly what is achievable and what is not. If an existing tool covers it, we will say so.
Contact us →